Businesses that mix up their logistics and use additional routes address many supply chain issues.

Having a robust supply chain strategy could make businesses more resilient to supply-chain disruptions. There are two main forms of supply management dilemmas: the very first is due to the supplier side, specifically supplier selection, supplier relationship, supply preparation, transportation and logistics. The second one deals with demand management issues. They are dilemmas linked to product launch, manufacturer product line administration, demand planning, product rates and advertising preparation. So, what common methods can businesses adopt to enhance their capability to maintain their operations each time a major interruption hits? Based on a recent research, two methods are increasingly showing to be effective when a interruption occurs. The first one is known as a flexible supply base, while the second one is called economic supply incentives. Although many on the market would argue that sourcing from a sole supplier cuts expenses, it may cause issues as demand fluctuates or when it comes to a disruption. Thus, counting on multiple suppliers can offset the risk connected with single sourcing. On the other hand, economic supply incentives work whenever buyer provides incentives to induce more suppliers to enter the marketplace. The buyer will have more freedom this way by moving production among manufacturers, particularly in areas where there is a small number of manufacturers.

To avoid taking on costs, various businesses give consideration to alternate paths. As an example, because of long delays at major worldwide ports in some African states, some businesses urge shippers to build up new paths as well as traditional channels. This strategy identifies and utilises other lesser-used ports. Instead of counting on just one major port, once the delivery business notice heavy traffic, they redirect products to more effective ports along the coast and then transport them inland via rail or road. In accordance with maritime experts, this strategy has many benefits not merely in relieving pressure on overwhelmed hubs, but additionally in the financial growth of emerging economies. Company leaders like AD Ports Group CEO may likely accept this view.

In supply chain management, interruption in just a route of a given transportation mode can dramatically influence the whole supply chain and, from time to time, even bring it to a halt. As such, business leaders like P&O Ferries CEO and Maersk CEO work hard to add flexibility within the mode of transport they rely on in a proactive way. As an example, some businesses utilise a versatile logistics strategy that utilises numerous modes of transport. They encourage their logistic partners to mix up their mode of transport to add all modes: vehicles, trains, motorcycles, bicycles, vessels and also helicopters. Investing in multimodal transport practices such as for instance a mix of train, road and maritime transportation as well as considering different geographical entry points minimises the vulnerabilities and risks associated with counting on one mode.